kernel_optimize_test/crypto/speck.c

308 lines
7.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Speck: a lightweight block cipher
*
* Copyright (c) 2018 Google, Inc
*
* Speck has 10 variants, including 5 block sizes. For now we only implement
* the variants Speck128/128, Speck128/192, Speck128/256, Speck64/96, and
* Speck64/128. Speck${B}/${K} denotes the variant with a block size of B bits
* and a key size of K bits. The Speck128 variants are believed to be the most
* secure variants, and they use the same block size and key sizes as AES. The
* Speck64 variants are less secure, but on 32-bit processors are usually
* faster. The remaining variants (Speck32, Speck48, and Speck96) are even less
* secure and/or not as well suited for implementation on either 32-bit or
* 64-bit processors, so are omitted.
*
* Reference: "The Simon and Speck Families of Lightweight Block Ciphers"
* https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/404.pdf
*
* In a correspondence, the Speck designers have also clarified that the words
* should be interpreted in little-endian format, and the words should be
* ordered such that the first word of each block is 'y' rather than 'x', and
* the first key word (rather than the last) becomes the first round key.
*/
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
#include <crypto/speck.h>
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/crypto.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
/* Speck128 */
static __always_inline void speck128_round(u64 *x, u64 *y, u64 k)
{
*x = ror64(*x, 8);
*x += *y;
*x ^= k;
*y = rol64(*y, 3);
*y ^= *x;
}
static __always_inline void speck128_unround(u64 *x, u64 *y, u64 k)
{
*y ^= *x;
*y = ror64(*y, 3);
*x ^= k;
*x -= *y;
*x = rol64(*x, 8);
}
void crypto_speck128_encrypt(const struct speck128_tfm_ctx *ctx,
u8 *out, const u8 *in)
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
{
u64 y = get_unaligned_le64(in);
u64 x = get_unaligned_le64(in + 8);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++)
speck128_round(&x, &y, ctx->round_keys[i]);
put_unaligned_le64(y, out);
put_unaligned_le64(x, out + 8);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_speck128_encrypt);
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
static void speck128_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
{
crypto_speck128_encrypt(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), out, in);
}
void crypto_speck128_decrypt(const struct speck128_tfm_ctx *ctx,
u8 *out, const u8 *in)
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
{
u64 y = get_unaligned_le64(in);
u64 x = get_unaligned_le64(in + 8);
int i;
for (i = ctx->nrounds - 1; i >= 0; i--)
speck128_unround(&x, &y, ctx->round_keys[i]);
put_unaligned_le64(y, out);
put_unaligned_le64(x, out + 8);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_speck128_decrypt);
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
static void speck128_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
{
crypto_speck128_decrypt(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), out, in);
}
int crypto_speck128_setkey(struct speck128_tfm_ctx *ctx, const u8 *key,
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
unsigned int keylen)
{
u64 l[3];
u64 k;
int i;
switch (keylen) {
case SPECK128_128_KEY_SIZE:
k = get_unaligned_le64(key);
l[0] = get_unaligned_le64(key + 8);
ctx->nrounds = SPECK128_128_NROUNDS;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++) {
ctx->round_keys[i] = k;
speck128_round(&l[0], &k, i);
}
break;
case SPECK128_192_KEY_SIZE:
k = get_unaligned_le64(key);
l[0] = get_unaligned_le64(key + 8);
l[1] = get_unaligned_le64(key + 16);
ctx->nrounds = SPECK128_192_NROUNDS;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++) {
ctx->round_keys[i] = k;
speck128_round(&l[i % 2], &k, i);
}
break;
case SPECK128_256_KEY_SIZE:
k = get_unaligned_le64(key);
l[0] = get_unaligned_le64(key + 8);
l[1] = get_unaligned_le64(key + 16);
l[2] = get_unaligned_le64(key + 24);
ctx->nrounds = SPECK128_256_NROUNDS;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++) {
ctx->round_keys[i] = k;
speck128_round(&l[i % 3], &k, i);
}
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_speck128_setkey);
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
static int speck128_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *key,
unsigned int keylen)
{
return crypto_speck128_setkey(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), key, keylen);
}
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
/* Speck64 */
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
static __always_inline void speck64_round(u32 *x, u32 *y, u32 k)
{
*x = ror32(*x, 8);
*x += *y;
*x ^= k;
*y = rol32(*y, 3);
*y ^= *x;
}
static __always_inline void speck64_unround(u32 *x, u32 *y, u32 k)
{
*y ^= *x;
*y = ror32(*y, 3);
*x ^= k;
*x -= *y;
*x = rol32(*x, 8);
}
void crypto_speck64_encrypt(const struct speck64_tfm_ctx *ctx,
u8 *out, const u8 *in)
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
{
u32 y = get_unaligned_le32(in);
u32 x = get_unaligned_le32(in + 4);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++)
speck64_round(&x, &y, ctx->round_keys[i]);
put_unaligned_le32(y, out);
put_unaligned_le32(x, out + 4);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_speck64_encrypt);
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
static void speck64_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
{
crypto_speck64_encrypt(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), out, in);
}
void crypto_speck64_decrypt(const struct speck64_tfm_ctx *ctx,
u8 *out, const u8 *in)
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
{
u32 y = get_unaligned_le32(in);
u32 x = get_unaligned_le32(in + 4);
int i;
for (i = ctx->nrounds - 1; i >= 0; i--)
speck64_unround(&x, &y, ctx->round_keys[i]);
put_unaligned_le32(y, out);
put_unaligned_le32(x, out + 4);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_speck64_decrypt);
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
static void speck64_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
{
crypto_speck64_decrypt(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), out, in);
}
int crypto_speck64_setkey(struct speck64_tfm_ctx *ctx, const u8 *key,
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
unsigned int keylen)
{
u32 l[3];
u32 k;
int i;
switch (keylen) {
case SPECK64_96_KEY_SIZE:
k = get_unaligned_le32(key);
l[0] = get_unaligned_le32(key + 4);
l[1] = get_unaligned_le32(key + 8);
ctx->nrounds = SPECK64_96_NROUNDS;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++) {
ctx->round_keys[i] = k;
speck64_round(&l[i % 2], &k, i);
}
break;
case SPECK64_128_KEY_SIZE:
k = get_unaligned_le32(key);
l[0] = get_unaligned_le32(key + 4);
l[1] = get_unaligned_le32(key + 8);
l[2] = get_unaligned_le32(key + 12);
ctx->nrounds = SPECK64_128_NROUNDS;
for (i = 0; i < ctx->nrounds; i++) {
ctx->round_keys[i] = k;
speck64_round(&l[i % 3], &k, i);
}
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_speck64_setkey);
static int speck64_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *key,
unsigned int keylen)
{
return crypto_speck64_setkey(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), key, keylen);
}
crypto: speck - add support for the Speck block cipher Add a generic implementation of Speck, including the Speck128 and Speck64 variants. Speck is a lightweight block cipher that can be much faster than AES on processors that don't have AES instructions. We are planning to offer Speck-XTS (probably Speck128/256-XTS) as an option for dm-crypt and fscrypt on Android, for low-end mobile devices with older CPUs such as ARMv7 which don't have the Cryptography Extensions. Currently, such devices are unencrypted because AES is not fast enough, even when the NEON bit-sliced implementation of AES is used. Other AES alternatives such as Twofish, Threefish, Camellia, CAST6, and Serpent aren't fast enough either; it seems that only a modern ARX cipher can provide sufficient performance on these devices. This is a replacement for our original proposal (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10101451/) which was to offer ChaCha20 for these devices. However, the use of a stream cipher for disk/file encryption with no space to store nonces would have been much more insecure than we thought initially, given that it would be used on top of flash storage as well as potentially on top of F2FS, neither of which is guaranteed to overwrite data in-place. Speck has been somewhat controversial due to its origin. Nevertheless, it has a straightforward design (it's an ARX cipher), and it appears to be the leading software-optimized lightweight block cipher currently, with the most cryptanalysis. It's also easy to implement without side channels, unlike AES. Moreover, we only intend Speck to be used when the status quo is no encryption, due to AES not being fast enough. We've also considered a novel length-preserving encryption mode based on ChaCha20 and Poly1305. While theoretically attractive, such a mode would be a brand new crypto construction and would be more complicated and difficult to implement efficiently in comparison to Speck-XTS. There is confusion about the byte and word orders of Speck, since the original paper doesn't specify them. But we have implemented it using the orders the authors recommended in a correspondence with them. The test vectors are taken from the original paper but were mapped to byte arrays using the recommended byte and word orders. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-02-15 02:42:19 +08:00
/* Algorithm definitions */
static struct crypto_alg speck_algs[] = {
{
.cra_name = "speck128",
.cra_driver_name = "speck128-generic",
.cra_priority = 100,
.cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER,
.cra_blocksize = SPECK128_BLOCK_SIZE,
.cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct speck128_tfm_ctx),
.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
.cra_u = {
.cipher = {
.cia_min_keysize = SPECK128_128_KEY_SIZE,
.cia_max_keysize = SPECK128_256_KEY_SIZE,
.cia_setkey = speck128_setkey,
.cia_encrypt = speck128_encrypt,
.cia_decrypt = speck128_decrypt
}
}
}, {
.cra_name = "speck64",
.cra_driver_name = "speck64-generic",
.cra_priority = 100,
.cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER,
.cra_blocksize = SPECK64_BLOCK_SIZE,
.cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct speck64_tfm_ctx),
.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
.cra_u = {
.cipher = {
.cia_min_keysize = SPECK64_96_KEY_SIZE,
.cia_max_keysize = SPECK64_128_KEY_SIZE,
.cia_setkey = speck64_setkey,
.cia_encrypt = speck64_encrypt,
.cia_decrypt = speck64_decrypt
}
}
}
};
static int __init speck_module_init(void)
{
return crypto_register_algs(speck_algs, ARRAY_SIZE(speck_algs));
}
static void __exit speck_module_exit(void)
{
crypto_unregister_algs(speck_algs, ARRAY_SIZE(speck_algs));
}
module_init(speck_module_init);
module_exit(speck_module_exit);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Speck block cipher (generic)");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>");
MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("speck128");
MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("speck128-generic");
MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("speck64");
MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("speck64-generic");