forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
genirq: Remove irq argument from report_bad_irq()
Not really a hotpath, so __report_bad_irq() can retrieve the irq number from the irq descriptor. [ tglx: Split out from combo patch ] Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b80f5f3fc0
commit
02d00eaa64
|
@ -188,10 +188,9 @@ static inline int bad_action_ret(irqreturn_t action_ret)
|
|||
* (The other 100-of-100,000 interrupts may have been a correctly
|
||||
* functioning device sharing an IRQ with the failing one)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
__report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
|
||||
irqreturn_t action_ret)
|
||||
static void __report_bad_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
|
||||
struct irqaction *action;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -224,14 +223,13 @@ __report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
|
|||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
|
||||
static void report_bad_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static int count = 100;
|
||||
|
||||
if (count > 0) {
|
||||
count--;
|
||||
__report_bad_irq(irq, desc, action_ret);
|
||||
__report_bad_irq(desc, action_ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -280,7 +278,7 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
|
|||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {
|
||||
report_bad_irq(irq, desc, action_ret);
|
||||
report_bad_irq(desc, action_ret);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* The interrupt is stuck
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__report_bad_irq(irq, desc, action_ret);
|
||||
__report_bad_irq(desc, action_ret);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now kill the IRQ
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user