forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[XTENSA] Remove unused code
We will never (need to) support signal handling coming from a double exception. There are too many things that could go wrong and delivering signals is not the fastest method for IPC, anyway. Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b4a49e21b
commit
03dfa442e5
|
@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
|
|||
|
||||
/* Unimplemented features. */
|
||||
|
||||
#undef SIGNAL_HANDLING_IN_DOUBLE_EXCEPTION
|
||||
#undef KERNEL_STACK_OVERFLOW_CHECK
|
||||
#undef PREEMPTIBLE_KERNEL
|
||||
#undef ALLOCA_EXCEPTION_IN_IRAM
|
||||
|
@ -431,11 +430,8 @@ common_exception_return:
|
|||
_bbsi.l a4, TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 3f
|
||||
_bbci.l a4, TIF_SIGPENDING, 4f
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef SIGNAL_HANDLING_IN_DOUBLE_EXCEPTION
|
||||
l32i a4, a1, PT_DEPC
|
||||
bgeui a4, VALID_DOUBLE_EXCEPTION_ADDRESS, 4f
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reenable interrupts and call do_signal() */
|
||||
|
||||
wsr a3, PS
|
||||
|
@ -1247,16 +1243,6 @@ fast_syscall_spill_registers_fixup:
|
|||
* Note: This frame might be the same as above.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef SIGNAL_HANDLING_IN_DOUBLE_EXCEPTION
|
||||
/* Restore registers we precautiously saved.
|
||||
* We have the value of the 'right' a3
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
l32i a7, a2, PT_AREG5
|
||||
l32i a11, a2, PT_AREG6
|
||||
l32i a15, a2, PT_AREG7
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Setup stack pointer. */
|
||||
|
||||
addi a2, a2, -PT_USER_SIZE
|
||||
|
@ -1290,14 +1276,6 @@ fast_syscall_spill_registers_fixup_return:
|
|||
s32i a2, a3, EXC_TABLE_PARAM
|
||||
l32i a2, a3, EXC_TABLE_KSTK
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef SIGNAL_HANDLING_IN_DOUBLE_EXCEPTION
|
||||
/* Save registers again that might be clobbered. */
|
||||
|
||||
s32i a7, a2, PT_AREG5
|
||||
s32i a11, a2, PT_AREG6
|
||||
s32i a15, a2, PT_AREG7
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Load WB at the time the exception occurred. */
|
||||
|
||||
rsr a3, SAR # WB is still in SAR
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user