forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ipmi:dmi: Ignore IPMI SMBIOS entries with a zero base address
Looking at logs from systems all over the place, it looks like tons of broken systems exist that set the base address to zero. I can only guess that is some sort of non-standard idea to mark the interface as not being present. It can't be zero, anyway, so just complain and ignore it. Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9abcfaaa7c
commit
1574608f5f
|
@ -218,6 +218,10 @@ static void __init dmi_decode_ipmi(const struct dmi_header *dm)
|
||||||
slave_addr = data[DMI_IPMI_SLAVEADDR];
|
slave_addr = data[DMI_IPMI_SLAVEADDR];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
memcpy(&base_addr, data + DMI_IPMI_ADDR, sizeof(unsigned long));
|
memcpy(&base_addr, data + DMI_IPMI_ADDR, sizeof(unsigned long));
|
||||||
|
if (!base_addr) {
|
||||||
|
pr_err("Base address is zero, assuming no IPMI interface\n");
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
if (len >= DMI_IPMI_VER2_LENGTH) {
|
if (len >= DMI_IPMI_VER2_LENGTH) {
|
||||||
if (type == IPMI_DMI_TYPE_SSIF) {
|
if (type == IPMI_DMI_TYPE_SSIF) {
|
||||||
offset = 0;
|
offset = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user