forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
bpf: bpf_prog_array_copy() should return -ENOENT if exclude_prog not found
This makes is it possible for bpf prog detach to return -ENOENT. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ce64f192d
commit
170a7e3ea0
|
@ -1616,6 +1616,7 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array,
|
|||
int new_prog_cnt, carry_prog_cnt = 0;
|
||||
struct bpf_prog **existing_prog;
|
||||
struct bpf_prog_array *array;
|
||||
bool found_exclude = false;
|
||||
int new_prog_idx = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Figure out how many existing progs we need to carry over to
|
||||
|
@ -1624,14 +1625,20 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array,
|
|||
if (old_array) {
|
||||
existing_prog = old_array->progs;
|
||||
for (; *existing_prog; existing_prog++) {
|
||||
if (*existing_prog != exclude_prog &&
|
||||
*existing_prog != &dummy_bpf_prog.prog)
|
||||
if (*existing_prog == exclude_prog) {
|
||||
found_exclude = true;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (*existing_prog != &dummy_bpf_prog.prog)
|
||||
carry_prog_cnt++;
|
||||
if (*existing_prog == include_prog)
|
||||
return -EEXIST;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (exclude_prog && !found_exclude)
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
|
||||
/* How many progs (not NULL) will be in the new array? */
|
||||
new_prog_cnt = carry_prog_cnt;
|
||||
if (include_prog)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1006,6 +1006,8 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event)
|
|||
|
||||
old_array = event->tp_event->prog_array;
|
||||
ret = bpf_prog_array_copy(old_array, event->prog, NULL, &new_array);
|
||||
if (ret == -ENOENT)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(old_array, event->prog);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user