forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
afs: Don't over-increment the cell usage count when pinning it
AFS cells that are added or set as the workstation cell through /proc are pinned against removal by setting the AFS_CELL_FL_NO_GC flag on them and taking a ref. The ref should be only taken if the flag wasn't already set. Fix this by making it conditional. Without this an assertion failure will occur during module removal indicating that the refcount is too elevated. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe342cf77b
commit
17814aef57
|
@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ int afs_cell_init(struct afs_net *net, const char *rootcell)
|
|||
return PTR_ERR(new_root);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
set_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NO_GC, &new_root->flags);
|
||||
afs_get_cell(new_root);
|
||||
if (!test_and_set_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NO_GC, &new_root->flags))
|
||||
afs_get_cell(new_root);
|
||||
|
||||
/* install the new cell */
|
||||
write_seqlock(&net->cells_lock);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ static ssize_t afs_proc_cells_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
|
|||
goto done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
set_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NO_GC, &cell->flags);
|
||||
if (test_and_set_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NO_GC, &cell->flags))
|
||||
afs_put_cell(net, cell);
|
||||
printk("kAFS: Added new cell '%s'\n", name);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
goto inval;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user