forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped()
wait_task_stopped() tested task_stopped_code() without acquiring siglock and, if stop condition existed, called wait_task_stopped() and directly returned the result. This patch moves the initial task_stopped_code() testing into wait_task_stopped() and make wait_consider_task() fall through to wait_task_continue() on 0 return. This is for the following two reasons. * Because the initial task_stopped_code() test is done without acquiring siglock, it may race against SIGCONT generation. The stopped condition might have been replaced by continued state by the time wait_task_stopped() acquired siglock. This may lead to unexpected failure of WNOHANG waits. This reorganization addresses this single race case but there are other cases - TASK_RUNNING -> TASK_STOPPED transition and EXIT_* transitions. * Scheduled ptrace updates require changes to the initial test which would fit better inside wait_task_stopped(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
40ae717d1e
commit
19e274630c
|
@ -1377,11 +1377,23 @@ static int *task_stopped_code(struct task_struct *p, bool ptrace)
|
||||||
return NULL;
|
return NULL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/**
|
||||||
* Handle sys_wait4 work for one task in state TASK_STOPPED. We hold
|
* wait_task_stopped - Wait for %TASK_STOPPED or %TASK_TRACED
|
||||||
* read_lock(&tasklist_lock) on entry. If we return zero, we still hold
|
* @wo: wait options
|
||||||
* the lock and this task is uninteresting. If we return nonzero, we have
|
* @ptrace: is the wait for ptrace
|
||||||
* released the lock and the system call should return.
|
* @p: task to wait for
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Handle sys_wait4() work for %p in state %TASK_STOPPED or %TASK_TRACED.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* CONTEXT:
|
||||||
|
* read_lock(&tasklist_lock), which is released if return value is
|
||||||
|
* non-zero. Also, grabs and releases @p->sighand->siglock.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* RETURNS:
|
||||||
|
* 0 if wait condition didn't exist and search for other wait conditions
|
||||||
|
* should continue. Non-zero return, -errno on failure and @p's pid on
|
||||||
|
* success, implies that tasklist_lock is released and wait condition
|
||||||
|
* search should terminate.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static int wait_task_stopped(struct wait_opts *wo,
|
static int wait_task_stopped(struct wait_opts *wo,
|
||||||
int ptrace, struct task_struct *p)
|
int ptrace, struct task_struct *p)
|
||||||
|
@ -1397,6 +1409,9 @@ static int wait_task_stopped(struct wait_opts *wo,
|
||||||
if (!ptrace && !(wo->wo_flags & WUNTRACED))
|
if (!ptrace && !(wo->wo_flags & WUNTRACED))
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (!task_stopped_code(p, ptrace))
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
exit_code = 0;
|
exit_code = 0;
|
||||||
spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
|
spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1607,8 +1622,9 @@ static int wait_consider_task(struct wait_opts *wo, int ptrace,
|
||||||
* Wait for stopped. Depending on @ptrace, different stopped state
|
* Wait for stopped. Depending on @ptrace, different stopped state
|
||||||
* is used and the two don't interact with each other.
|
* is used and the two don't interact with each other.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (task_stopped_code(p, ptrace))
|
ret = wait_task_stopped(wo, ptrace, p);
|
||||||
return wait_task_stopped(wo, ptrace, p);
|
if (ret)
|
||||||
|
return ret;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Wait for continued. There's only one continued state and the
|
* Wait for continued. There's only one continued state and the
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user