forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ASoC: add SOC_VALUE_ENUM_EXT
Adds an equivalent of SOC_ENUM_EXT for value enums Strictly speaking SOC_ENUM_EXT can also be used to define a value enum since the only difference is the get and set functions. But this doesn't look good in code because it is inconsistent with the normal control definitions. Adding a specific SOC_VALUE_ENUM_EXT is better for code clarity. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7171511eae
commit
1e4c0d7c9a
|
@ -248,6 +248,8 @@
|
|||
.info = snd_soc_info_enum_double, \
|
||||
.get = xhandler_get, .put = xhandler_put, \
|
||||
.private_value = (unsigned long)&xenum }
|
||||
#define SOC_VALUE_ENUM_EXT(xname, xenum, xhandler_get, xhandler_put) \
|
||||
SOC_ENUM_EXT(xname, xenum, xhandler_get, xhandler_put)
|
||||
|
||||
#define SND_SOC_BYTES(xname, xbase, xregs) \
|
||||
{ .iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = xname, \
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user