forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sched/fair: Spread out tasks evenly when not overloaded
When there is only one CPU per group, using the idle CPUs to evenly spread tasks doesn't make sense and nr_running is a better metrics. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: hdanton@sina.com Cc: parth@linux.ibm.com Cc: pauld@redhat.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: riel@surriel.com Cc: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1571405198-27570-8-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b0fb1eb4f0
commit
2ab4092fc8
|
@ -8591,18 +8591,34 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
|
|||
busiest->sum_nr_running > local->sum_nr_running + 1)
|
||||
goto force_balance;
|
||||
|
||||
if (busiest->group_type != group_overloaded &&
|
||||
(env->idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE ||
|
||||
local->idle_cpus <= (busiest->idle_cpus + 1)))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the busiest group is not overloaded
|
||||
* and there is no imbalance between this and busiest group
|
||||
* wrt. idle CPUs, it is balanced. The imbalance
|
||||
* becomes significant if the diff is greater than 1 otherwise
|
||||
* we might end up just moving the imbalance to another
|
||||
* group.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto out_balanced;
|
||||
if (busiest->group_type != group_overloaded) {
|
||||
if (env->idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the busiest group is not overloaded (and as a
|
||||
* result the local one too) but this CPU is already
|
||||
* busy, let another idle CPU try to pull task.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto out_balanced;
|
||||
|
||||
if (busiest->group_weight > 1 &&
|
||||
local->idle_cpus <= (busiest->idle_cpus + 1))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the busiest group is not overloaded
|
||||
* and there is no imbalance between this and busiest
|
||||
* group wrt idle CPUs, it is balanced. The imbalance
|
||||
* becomes significant if the diff is greater than 1
|
||||
* otherwise we might end up to just move the imbalance
|
||||
* on another group. Of course this applies only if
|
||||
* there is more than 1 CPU per group.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto out_balanced;
|
||||
|
||||
if (busiest->sum_h_nr_running == 1)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* busiest doesn't have any tasks waiting to run
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto out_balanced;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
force_balance:
|
||||
/* Looks like there is an imbalance. Compute it */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user