forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Btrfs: fix "mutually exclusive op is running" error code
The error code that is returned in response to starting a mutually
exclusive operation when there is one already running got silently
changed from EINVAL to EINPROGRESS by 5ac00add
. Returning EINPROGRESS
to, say, add_dev, when rm_dev is running is misleading. Furthermore,
the operation itself may want to use EINPROGRESS for other purposes.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed0fb78fb6
commit
2c0c9da02a
|
@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_resize(struct file *file,
|
|||
1)) {
|
||||
pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation in progress\n");
|
||||
mnt_drop_write_file(file);
|
||||
return -EINPROGRESS;
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
|
||||
|
@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_defrag(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
|
|||
if (atomic_xchg(&root->fs_info->mutually_exclusive_operation_running,
|
||||
1)) {
|
||||
pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation in progress\n");
|
||||
return -EINPROGRESS;
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = mnt_want_write_file(file);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
|
@ -2266,7 +2266,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_add_dev(struct btrfs_root *root, void __user *arg)
|
|||
if (atomic_xchg(&root->fs_info->mutually_exclusive_operation_running,
|
||||
1)) {
|
||||
pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation in progress\n");
|
||||
return -EINPROGRESS;
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
|
||||
|
@ -2303,7 +2303,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
|
|||
1)) {
|
||||
pr_info("btrfs: dev add/delete/balance/replace/resize operation in progress\n");
|
||||
mnt_drop_write_file(file);
|
||||
return -EINPROGRESS;
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user