forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[SCSI] zfcp: Fix check whether unchained ct_els is possible
A false check was performed whether an unchained ct_els is possible or not. Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5adcbeb34d
commit
30b6777b89
|
@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */
|
||||
if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) || zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
|
||||
if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) && zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
|
||||
zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req,
|
||||
sg_req, sg_resp);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user