forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()
On x86-64, with CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n, GCC's "global common subexpression
elimination" optimization results in ___bpf_prog_run()'s jumptable code
changing from this:
select_insn:
jmp *jumptable(, %rax, 8)
...
ALU64_ADD_X:
...
jmp *jumptable(, %rax, 8)
ALU_ADD_X:
...
jmp *jumptable(, %rax, 8)
to this:
select_insn:
mov jumptable, %r12
jmp *(%r12, %rax, 8)
...
ALU64_ADD_X:
...
jmp *(%r12, %rax, 8)
ALU_ADD_X:
...
jmp *(%r12, %rax, 8)
The jumptable address is placed in a register once, at the beginning of
the function. The function execution can then go through multiple
indirect jumps which rely on that same register value. This has a few
issues:
1) Objtool isn't smart enough to be able to track such a register value
across multiple recursive indirect jumps through the jump table.
2) With CONFIG_RETPOLINE enabled, this optimization actually results in
a small slowdown. I measured a ~4.7% slowdown in the test_bpf
"tcpdump port 22" selftest.
This slowdown is actually predicted by the GCC manual:
Note: When compiling a program using computed gotos, a GCC
extension, you may get better run-time performance if you
disable the global common subexpression elimination pass by
adding -fno-gcse to the command line.
So just disable the optimization for this function.
Fixes: e55a73251d
("bpf: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF code")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/30c3ca29ba037afcbd860a8672eef0021addf9fe.1563413318.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
82e844a653
commit
3193c0836f
|
@ -170,3 +170,5 @@
|
|||
#else
|
||||
#define __diag_GCC_8(s)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#define __no_fgcse __attribute__((optimize("-fno-gcse")))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -189,6 +189,10 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
|
|||
#define asm_volatile_goto(x...) asm goto(x)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef __no_fgcse
|
||||
# define __no_fgcse
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are two types/vars the same type (ignoring qualifiers)? */
|
||||
#define __same_type(a, b) __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(a), typeof(b))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ bool bpf_opcode_in_insntable(u8 code)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Decode and execute eBPF instructions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
|
||||
static u64 __no_fgcse ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#define BPF_INSN_2_LBL(x, y) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y] = &&x##_##y
|
||||
#define BPF_INSN_3_LBL(x, y, z) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y | BPF_##z] = &&x##_##y##_##z
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user