locking/osq_lock: Annotate a data race in osq_lock

The prev->next pointer can be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN:

 write (marked) to 0xffff9d3370dbbe40 of 8 bytes by task 3294 on cpu 107:
  osq_lock+0x25f/0x350
  osq_wait_next at kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:79
  (inlined by) osq_lock at kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:185
  rwsem_optimistic_spin
  <snip>

 read to 0xffff9d3370dbbe40 of 8 bytes by task 3398 on cpu 100:
  osq_lock+0x196/0x350
  osq_lock at kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:157
  rwsem_optimistic_spin
  <snip>

Since the write only stores NULL to prev->next and the read tests if
prev->next equals to this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node). Even if the value is
shattered, the code is still working correctly. Thus, mark it as an
intentional data race using the data_race() macro.

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Qian Cai 2020-02-11 08:54:15 -05:00 committed by Paul E. McKenney
parent 1fe84fd4a4
commit 33190b675c

View File

@ -154,7 +154,11 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
*/ */
for (;;) { for (;;) {
if (prev->next == node && /*
* cpu_relax() below implies a compiler barrier which would
* prevent this comparison being optimized away.
*/
if (data_race(prev->next) == node &&
cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node) cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
break; break;