forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
xfs: inode lockdep annotations broke non-lockdep build
Fix CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n build, because asserts I put in to ensure we
aren't overrunning lockdep subclasses in commit 0952c81
("xfs:
clean up inode lockdep annotations") use a define that doesn't
exist when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n
Only check the subclass limits when lockdep is actually enabled.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d751af2cb
commit
3403ccc0c9
|
@ -362,6 +362,17 @@ int xfs_lots_retries;
|
|||
int xfs_lock_delays;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
|
||||
static bool
|
||||
xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(
|
||||
int subclass)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return subclass < MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass) (true)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Bump the subclass so xfs_lock_inodes() acquires each lock with a different
|
||||
* value. This can be called for any type of inode lock combination, including
|
||||
|
@ -375,11 +386,12 @@ xfs_lock_inumorder(int lock_mode, int subclass)
|
|||
|
||||
ASSERT(!(lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_PARENT | XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP |
|
||||
XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM)));
|
||||
ASSERT(xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass));
|
||||
|
||||
if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
|
||||
ASSERT(subclass <= XFS_IOLOCK_MAX_SUBCLASS);
|
||||
ASSERT(subclass + XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL <
|
||||
MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES);
|
||||
ASSERT(xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass +
|
||||
XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL));
|
||||
class += subclass << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT;
|
||||
if (lock_mode & XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT)
|
||||
class += XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user