forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
irqchip/gic-v3: Remove acknowledge loop
Multiple interrupts pending for a CPU is actually rare. Doing an acknowledge loop does not give much better performance or even can deteriorate them. Do not loop when an interrupt has been acknowledged, just return from interrupt and wait for another one to be raised. Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
079f453200
commit
342677d70a
|
@ -348,48 +348,45 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
|
|||
{
|
||||
u32 irqnr;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
irqnr = gic_read_iar();
|
||||
irqnr = gic_read_iar();
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key))
|
||||
gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
|
||||
else
|
||||
isb();
|
||||
|
||||
err = handle_domain_irq(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected interrupt received!\n");
|
||||
if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key)) {
|
||||
if (irqnr < 8192)
|
||||
gic_write_dir(irqnr);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (irqnr < 16) {
|
||||
if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key))
|
||||
gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
|
||||
if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key))
|
||||
gic_write_dir(irqnr);
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unlike GICv2, we don't need an smp_rmb() here.
|
||||
* The control dependency from gic_read_iar to
|
||||
* the ISB in gic_write_eoir is enough to ensure
|
||||
* that any shared data read by handle_IPI will
|
||||
* be read after the ACK.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
handle_IPI(irqnr, regs);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected SGI received!\n");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
else
|
||||
isb();
|
||||
|
||||
err = handle_domain_irq(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected interrupt received!\n");
|
||||
if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key)) {
|
||||
if (irqnr < 8192)
|
||||
gic_write_dir(irqnr);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (irqnr != ICC_IAR1_EL1_SPURIOUS);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (irqnr < 16) {
|
||||
gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
|
||||
if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key))
|
||||
gic_write_dir(irqnr);
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unlike GICv2, we don't need an smp_rmb() here.
|
||||
* The control dependency from gic_read_iar to
|
||||
* the ISB in gic_write_eoir is enough to ensure
|
||||
* that any shared data read by handle_IPI will
|
||||
* be read after the ACK.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
handle_IPI(irqnr, regs);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected SGI received!\n");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __init gic_dist_init(void)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user