forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
io_uring: get rid of kiocb_wait_page_queue_init()
The 5.9 merge moved this function io_uring, which means that we don't need to retain the generic nature of it. Clean up this part by removing redundant checks, and just inlining the small remainder in io_rw_should_retry(). No functional changes in this patch. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b711d4eaf0
commit
3b2a4439e0
|
@ -3074,27 +3074,6 @@ static int io_async_buf_func(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
|
|||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int kiocb_wait_page_queue_init(struct kiocb *kiocb,
|
||||
struct wait_page_queue *wait,
|
||||
wait_queue_func_t func,
|
||||
void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Can't support async wakeup with polled IO */
|
||||
if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (kiocb->ki_filp->f_mode & FMODE_BUF_RASYNC) {
|
||||
wait->wait.func = func;
|
||||
wait->wait.private = data;
|
||||
wait->wait.flags = 0;
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wait->wait.entry);
|
||||
kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_WAITQ;
|
||||
kiocb->ki_waitq = wait;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This controls whether a given IO request should be armed for async page
|
||||
* based retry. If we return false here, the request is handed to the async
|
||||
|
@ -3109,16 +3088,17 @@ static inline int kiocb_wait_page_queue_init(struct kiocb *kiocb,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static bool io_rw_should_retry(struct io_kiocb *req)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct wait_page_queue *wait = &req->io->rw.wpq;
|
||||
struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw.kiocb;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* never retry for NOWAIT, we just complete with -EAGAIN */
|
||||
if (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only for buffered IO */
|
||||
if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT)
|
||||
if (kiocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_DIRECT | IOCB_HIPRI))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* just use poll if we can, and don't attempt if the fs doesn't
|
||||
* support callback based unlocks
|
||||
|
@ -3126,14 +3106,15 @@ static bool io_rw_should_retry(struct io_kiocb *req)
|
|||
if (file_can_poll(req->file) || !(req->file->f_mode & FMODE_BUF_RASYNC))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = kiocb_wait_page_queue_init(kiocb, &req->io->rw.wpq,
|
||||
io_async_buf_func, req);
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
io_get_req_task(req);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
wait->wait.func = io_async_buf_func;
|
||||
wait->wait.private = req;
|
||||
wait->wait.flags = 0;
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wait->wait.entry);
|
||||
kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_WAITQ;
|
||||
kiocb->ki_waitq = wait;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
io_get_req_task(req);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int io_iter_do_read(struct io_kiocb *req, struct iov_iter *iter)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user