forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
rtmutex: Document pi chain walk
Add commentry to document the chain walk and the protection mechanisms and their scope. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
parent
a57594a13a
commit
3eb65aeadf
|
|
@ -337,6 +337,48 @@ static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
* @top_task: the current top waiter
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns 0 or -EDEADLK.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Chain walk basics and protection scope
|
||||
*
|
||||
* [R] refcount on task
|
||||
* [P] task->pi_lock held
|
||||
* [L] rtmutex->wait_lock held
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Step Description Protected by
|
||||
* function arguments:
|
||||
* @task [R]
|
||||
* @orig_lock if != NULL @top_task is blocked on it
|
||||
* @next_lock Unprotected. Cannot be
|
||||
* dereferenced. Only used for
|
||||
* comparison.
|
||||
* @orig_waiter if != NULL @top_task is blocked on it
|
||||
* @top_task current, or in case of proxy
|
||||
* locking protected by calling
|
||||
* code
|
||||
* again:
|
||||
* loop_sanity_check();
|
||||
* retry:
|
||||
* [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P]
|
||||
* [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P]
|
||||
* [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P]
|
||||
* [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P]
|
||||
* [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P] try to acquire [L]
|
||||
* unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P]
|
||||
* goto retry;
|
||||
* }
|
||||
* [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P] + [L]
|
||||
* [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P] + [L]
|
||||
* [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P]
|
||||
* put_task_struct(task); release [R]
|
||||
* [9] check_exit_conditions_3(); [L]
|
||||
* [10] task = owner(lock); [L]
|
||||
* get_task_struct(task); [L] acquire [R]
|
||||
* lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P]
|
||||
* [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P] + [L]
|
||||
* [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P] + [L]
|
||||
* [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P]
|
||||
* unlock(lock->wait_lock); release [L]
|
||||
* goto again;
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
int deadlock_detect,
|
||||
|
|
@ -361,6 +403,9 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
* carefully whether things change under us.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
again:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We limit the lock chain length for each invocation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (++depth > max_lock_depth) {
|
||||
static int prev_max;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -378,13 +423,28 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
|
||||
return -EDEADLK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are fully preemptible here and only hold the refcount on
|
||||
* @task. So everything can have changed under us since the
|
||||
* caller or our own code below (goto retry/again) dropped all
|
||||
* locks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Task can not go away as we did a get_task() before !
|
||||
* [1] Task cannot go away as we did a get_task() before !
|
||||
*/
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [2] Get the waiter on which @task is blocked on.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [3] check_exit_conditions_1() protected by task->pi_lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check whether the end of the boosting chain has been
|
||||
* reached or the state of the chain has changed while we
|
||||
|
|
@ -435,7 +495,15 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->prio == task->prio)
|
||||
goto out_unlock_pi;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [4] Get the next lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lock = waiter->lock;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [5] We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock,
|
||||
* which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex
|
||||
* operations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
|
|
@ -443,6 +511,9 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [6] check_exit_conditions_2() protected by task->pi_lock and
|
||||
* lock->wait_lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original
|
||||
* lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the
|
||||
* current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain
|
||||
|
|
@ -462,24 +533,27 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Requeue the waiter in the lock waiter list. */
|
||||
/* [7] Requeue the waiter in the lock waiter list. */
|
||||
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
waiter->prio = task->prio;
|
||||
rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Release the task */
|
||||
/* [8] Release the task */
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
put_task_struct(task);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even
|
||||
* in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to
|
||||
* follow here. This is the end of the chain we are walking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the requeue above changed the top waiter, then we need
|
||||
* to wake the new top waiter up to try to get the lock.
|
||||
* If the requeue [7] above changed the top waiter,
|
||||
* then we need to wake the new top waiter up to try
|
||||
* to get the lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
|
||||
wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task);
|
||||
|
|
@ -487,11 +561,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock */
|
||||
/* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock */
|
||||
task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
||||
get_task_struct(task);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* [11] requeue the pi waiters if necessary */
|
||||
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The waiter became the new top (highest priority)
|
||||
|
|
@ -526,23 +601,30 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* [12] check_exit_conditions_4() protected by task->pi_lock
|
||||
* and lock->wait_lock. The actual decisions are made after we
|
||||
* dropped the locks.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Check whether the task which owns the current lock is pi
|
||||
* blocked itself. If yes we store a pointer to the lock for
|
||||
* the lock chain change detection above. After we dropped
|
||||
* task->pi_lock next_lock cannot be dereferenced anymore.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Store the top waiter of @lock for the end of chain walk
|
||||
* decision below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* [13] Drop the locks */
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make the actual exit decisions [12], based on the stored
|
||||
* values.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We reached the end of the lock chain. Stop right here. No
|
||||
* point to go back just to figure that out.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user