forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sched/numa: Implement NUMA node level wake_affine()
Since select_idle_sibling() can place a task anywhere on a socket, comparing loads between individual CPU cores makes no real sense for deciding whether to do an affine wakeup across sockets, either. Instead, compare the load between the sockets in a similar way the load balancer and the numa balancing code do. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: jhladky@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170623165530.22514-4-riel@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d894e6e34
commit
3fed382b46
|
@ -2586,6 +2586,60 @@ void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Can a task be moved from prev_cpu to this_cpu without causing a load
|
||||
* imbalance that would trigger the load balancer?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool numa_wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd,
|
||||
struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu,
|
||||
int prev_cpu, int sync)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct numa_stats prev_load, this_load;
|
||||
s64 this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
|
||||
|
||||
update_numa_stats(&prev_load, cpu_to_node(prev_cpu));
|
||||
update_numa_stats(&this_load, cpu_to_node(this_cpu));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
|
||||
* effect of the currently running task from the load
|
||||
* of the current CPU:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sync) {
|
||||
unsigned long current_load = task_h_load(current);
|
||||
|
||||
if (this_load.load > current_load)
|
||||
this_load.load -= current_load;
|
||||
else
|
||||
this_load.load = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In low-load situations, where this_cpu's node is idle due to the
|
||||
* sync cause above having dropped this_load.load to 0, move the task.
|
||||
* Moving to an idle socket will not create a bad imbalance.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Otherwise check if the nodes are near enough in load to allow this
|
||||
* task to be woken on this_cpu's node.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (this_load.load > 0) {
|
||||
unsigned long task_load = task_h_load(p);
|
||||
|
||||
this_eff_load = 100;
|
||||
this_eff_load *= prev_load.compute_capacity;
|
||||
|
||||
prev_eff_load = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
|
||||
prev_eff_load *= this_load.compute_capacity;
|
||||
|
||||
this_eff_load *= this_load.load + task_load;
|
||||
prev_eff_load *= prev_load.load - task_load;
|
||||
|
||||
return this_eff_load <= prev_eff_load;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -2598,6 +2652,13 @@ static inline void account_numa_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
static inline void account_numa_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool numa_wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd,
|
||||
struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu,
|
||||
int prev_cpu, int sync)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
|
@ -5407,74 +5468,25 @@ static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
|
||||
int prev_cpu, int sync)
|
||||
{
|
||||
s64 this_load, load;
|
||||
s64 this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
|
||||
int idx, this_cpu;
|
||||
struct task_group *tg;
|
||||
unsigned long weight;
|
||||
int balanced;
|
||||
|
||||
idx = sd->wake_idx;
|
||||
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
||||
load = source_load(prev_cpu, idx);
|
||||
this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx);
|
||||
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
||||
bool affine = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Common case: CPUs are in the same socket, and select_idle_sibling()
|
||||
* will do its thing regardless of what we return:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cpus_share_cache(prev_cpu, this_cpu))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
|
||||
* effect of the currently running task from the load
|
||||
* of the current CPU:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sync) {
|
||||
tg = task_group(current);
|
||||
weight = current->se.avg.load_avg;
|
||||
|
||||
this_load += effective_load(tg, this_cpu, -weight, -weight);
|
||||
load += effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, -weight);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tg = task_group(p);
|
||||
weight = p->se.avg.load_avg;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In low-load situations, where prev_cpu is idle and this_cpu is idle
|
||||
* due to the sync cause above having dropped this_load to 0, we'll
|
||||
* always have an imbalance, but there's really nothing you can do
|
||||
* about that, so that's good too.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Otherwise check if either cpus are near enough in load to allow this
|
||||
* task to be woken on this_cpu.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this_eff_load = 100;
|
||||
this_eff_load *= capacity_of(prev_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
prev_eff_load = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
|
||||
prev_eff_load *= capacity_of(this_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
if (this_load > 0) {
|
||||
this_eff_load *= this_load +
|
||||
effective_load(tg, this_cpu, weight, weight);
|
||||
|
||||
prev_eff_load *= load + effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, weight);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
balanced = this_eff_load <= prev_eff_load;
|
||||
affine = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
affine = numa_wake_affine(sd, p, this_cpu, prev_cpu, sync);
|
||||
|
||||
schedstat_inc(p->se.statistics.nr_wakeups_affine_attempts);
|
||||
if (affine) {
|
||||
schedstat_inc(sd->ttwu_move_affine);
|
||||
schedstat_inc(p->se.statistics.nr_wakeups_affine);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!balanced)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
schedstat_inc(sd->ttwu_move_affine);
|
||||
schedstat_inc(p->se.statistics.nr_wakeups_affine);
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return affine;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int task_util(struct task_struct *p);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user