forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
softirqs: Account ksoftirqd time as cpustat softirq
softirq time in ksoftirqd context is not accounted in ns granularity per cpu softirq stats, as we want that to be a part of ksoftirqd exec_runtime. Accounting them as softirq on /proc/stat separately. Tested-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1292980144-28796-6-git-send-email-venki@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
abb74cefa9
commit
414bee9ba6
|
@ -3686,6 +3686,14 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
|
|||
cpustat->irq = cputime64_add(cpustat->irq, tmp);
|
||||
} else if (irqtime_account_si_update()) {
|
||||
cpustat->softirq = cputime64_add(cpustat->softirq, tmp);
|
||||
} else if (this_cpu_ksoftirqd() == p) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* ksoftirqd time do not get accounted in cpu_softirq_time.
|
||||
* So, we have to handle it separately here.
|
||||
* Also, p->stime needs to be updated for ksoftirqd.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__account_system_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled,
|
||||
&cpustat->softirq);
|
||||
} else if (user_tick) {
|
||||
account_user_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled);
|
||||
} else if (p == rq->idle) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user