forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
tcp: Remove redundant checks when setting eff_sacks
Remove redundant checks when setting eff_sacks and make the number of SACKs a compile time constant. Now that the options code knows how many SACK blocks can fit in the header, we don't need to have the SACK code guessing at it. Signed-off-by: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
33ad798c92
commit
4389dded77
|
@ -224,6 +224,12 @@ struct tcp_options_received {
|
|||
u16 mss_clamp; /* Maximal mss, negotiated at connection setup */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* This is the max number of SACKS that we'll generate and process. It's safe
|
||||
* to increse this, although since:
|
||||
* size = TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE_ALIGNED (4) + n * TCPOLEN_SACK_PERBLOCK (8)
|
||||
* only four options will fit in a standard TCP header */
|
||||
#define TCP_NUM_SACKS 4
|
||||
|
||||
struct tcp_request_sock {
|
||||
struct inet_request_sock req;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1423,10 +1423,10 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
|
|||
unsigned char *ptr = (skb_transport_header(ack_skb) +
|
||||
TCP_SKB_CB(ack_skb)->sacked);
|
||||
struct tcp_sack_block_wire *sp_wire = (struct tcp_sack_block_wire *)(ptr+2);
|
||||
struct tcp_sack_block sp[4];
|
||||
struct tcp_sack_block sp[TCP_NUM_SACKS];
|
||||
struct tcp_sack_block *cache;
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
int num_sacks = (ptr[1] - TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE) >> 3;
|
||||
int num_sacks = min(TCP_NUM_SACKS, (ptr[1] - TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE) >> 3);
|
||||
int used_sacks;
|
||||
int reord = tp->packets_out;
|
||||
int flag = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -3735,8 +3735,7 @@ static void tcp_dsack_set(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 end_seq)
|
|||
tp->rx_opt.dsack = 1;
|
||||
tp->duplicate_sack[0].start_seq = seq;
|
||||
tp->duplicate_sack[0].end_seq = end_seq;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = min(tp->rx_opt.num_sacks + 1,
|
||||
4 - tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok);
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = tp->rx_opt.num_sacks + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3791,9 +3790,8 @@ static void tcp_sack_maybe_coalesce(struct tcp_sock *tp)
|
|||
* Decrease num_sacks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.num_sacks--;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = min(tp->rx_opt.num_sacks +
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.dsack,
|
||||
4 - tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok);
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = tp->rx_opt.num_sacks +
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.dsack;
|
||||
for (i = this_sack; i < tp->rx_opt.num_sacks; i++)
|
||||
sp[i] = sp[i + 1];
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
@ -3843,7 +3841,7 @@ static void tcp_sack_new_ofo_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 end_seq)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* If the sack array is full, forget about the last one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (this_sack >= 4) {
|
||||
if (this_sack >= TCP_NUM_SACKS) {
|
||||
this_sack--;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.num_sacks--;
|
||||
sp--;
|
||||
|
@ -3856,8 +3854,7 @@ static void tcp_sack_new_ofo_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 end_seq)
|
|||
sp->start_seq = seq;
|
||||
sp->end_seq = end_seq;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.num_sacks++;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = min(tp->rx_opt.num_sacks + tp->rx_opt.dsack,
|
||||
4 - tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok);
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = tp->rx_opt.num_sacks + tp->rx_opt.dsack;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* RCV.NXT advances, some SACKs should be eaten. */
|
||||
|
@ -3894,9 +3891,8 @@ static void tcp_sack_remove(struct tcp_sock *tp)
|
|||
}
|
||||
if (num_sacks != tp->rx_opt.num_sacks) {
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.num_sacks = num_sacks;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = min(tp->rx_opt.num_sacks +
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.dsack,
|
||||
4 - tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok);
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = tp->rx_opt.num_sacks +
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.dsack;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3975,8 +3971,7 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||
|
||||
if (tp->rx_opt.dsack) {
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = min_t(unsigned int, tp->rx_opt.num_sacks,
|
||||
4 - tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok);
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = tp->rx_opt.num_sacks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Queue data for delivery to the user.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user