forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
idr: Fix handling of IDs above INT_MAX
Khalid reported that the kernel selftests are currently failing:
selftests: test_bpf.sh
========================================
test_bpf: [FAIL]
not ok 1..8 selftests: test_bpf.sh [FAIL]
He bisected it to 6ce711f275
("idr: Make
1-based IDRs more efficient").
The root cause is doing a signed comparison in idr_alloc_u32() instead
of an unsigned comparison. I went looking for any similar problems and
found a couple (which would each result in the failure to warn in two
situations that aren't supposed to happen).
I knocked up a few test-cases to prove that I was right and added them
to the test-suite.
Reported-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d4d5d6186
commit
4b0ad07653
13
lib/idr.c
13
lib/idr.c
|
@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ int idr_alloc_u32(struct idr *idr, void *ptr, u32 *nextid,
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct radix_tree_iter iter;
|
||||
void __rcu **slot;
|
||||
int base = idr->idr_base;
|
||||
int id = *nextid;
|
||||
unsigned int base = idr->idr_base;
|
||||
unsigned int id = *nextid;
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(radix_tree_is_internal_node(ptr)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
@ -204,10 +204,11 @@ int idr_for_each(const struct idr *idr,
|
|||
|
||||
radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &idr->idr_rt, &iter, 0) {
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
unsigned long id = iter.index + base;
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iter.index > INT_MAX))
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(id > INT_MAX))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
ret = fn(iter.index + base, rcu_dereference_raw(*slot), data);
|
||||
ret = fn(id, rcu_dereference_raw(*slot), data);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -230,8 +231,8 @@ void *idr_get_next(struct idr *idr, int *nextid)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct radix_tree_iter iter;
|
||||
void __rcu **slot;
|
||||
int base = idr->idr_base;
|
||||
int id = *nextid;
|
||||
unsigned long base = idr->idr_base;
|
||||
unsigned long id = *nextid;
|
||||
|
||||
id = (id < base) ? 0 : id - base;
|
||||
slot = radix_tree_iter_find(&idr->idr_rt, &iter, id);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -178,6 +178,55 @@ void idr_get_next_test(int base)
|
|||
idr_destroy(&idr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int idr_u32_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BUG_ON(id < 0);
|
||||
BUG_ON(ptr != DUMMY_PTR);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void idr_u32_test1(struct idr *idr, u32 handle)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static bool warned = false;
|
||||
u32 id = handle;
|
||||
int sid = 0;
|
||||
void *ptr;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(idr_alloc_u32(idr, DUMMY_PTR, &id, id, GFP_KERNEL));
|
||||
BUG_ON(id != handle);
|
||||
BUG_ON(idr_alloc_u32(idr, DUMMY_PTR, &id, id, GFP_KERNEL) != -ENOSPC);
|
||||
BUG_ON(id != handle);
|
||||
if (!warned && id > INT_MAX)
|
||||
printk("vvv Ignore these warnings\n");
|
||||
ptr = idr_get_next(idr, &sid);
|
||||
if (id > INT_MAX) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(ptr != NULL);
|
||||
BUG_ON(sid != 0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
BUG_ON(ptr != DUMMY_PTR);
|
||||
BUG_ON(sid != id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
idr_for_each(idr, idr_u32_cb, NULL);
|
||||
if (!warned && id > INT_MAX) {
|
||||
printk("^^^ Warnings over\n");
|
||||
warned = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
BUG_ON(idr_remove(idr, id) != DUMMY_PTR);
|
||||
BUG_ON(!idr_is_empty(idr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void idr_u32_test(int base)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DEFINE_IDR(idr);
|
||||
idr_init_base(&idr, base);
|
||||
idr_u32_test1(&idr, 10);
|
||||
idr_u32_test1(&idr, 0x7fffffff);
|
||||
idr_u32_test1(&idr, 0x80000000);
|
||||
idr_u32_test1(&idr, 0x80000001);
|
||||
idr_u32_test1(&idr, 0xffe00000);
|
||||
idr_u32_test1(&idr, 0xffffffff);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void idr_checks(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long i;
|
||||
|
@ -248,6 +297,9 @@ void idr_checks(void)
|
|||
idr_get_next_test(0);
|
||||
idr_get_next_test(1);
|
||||
idr_get_next_test(4);
|
||||
idr_u32_test(4);
|
||||
idr_u32_test(1);
|
||||
idr_u32_test(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user