AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity

sched,tracing: Convert to sched_set_fifo()

Browse Source 
One module user of sched_setscheduler() was overlooked and is
obviously causing build failures.

Convert ring_buffer_benchmark to use sched_set_fifo_low() when fifo==1
and sched_set_fifo() when fifo==2. This is a bit of an abuse, but it
makes the thing 'work' again.

Specifically, it enables all combinations that were previously
possible:

  producer higher than consumer
  consumer higher than producer

Fixes: 616d91b68c ("sched: Remove sched_setscheduler*() EXPORTs")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200720214918.GM5523@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2020-07-20 23:49:18 +02:00
parent 8b700983de
commit 4fd5750af0
1 changed files with 23 additions and 25 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

48
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
View File

@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_iteration, "# of writes between timestamp readings");
static int producer_nice = MAX_NICE;
static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE;
static int producer_fifo = -1;
static int consumer_fifo = -1;
static int producer_fifo;
static int consumer_fifo;
module_param(producer_nice, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_nice, "nice prio for producer");
@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ module_param(consumer_nice, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_nice, "nice prio for consumer");
module_param(producer_fifo, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_fifo, "fifo prio for producer");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_fifo, "use fifo for producer: 0 - disabled, 1 - low prio, 2 - fifo");
module_param(consumer_fifo, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_fifo, "fifo prio for consumer");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_fifo, "use fifo for consumer: 0 - disabled, 1 - low prio, 2 - fifo");
static int read_events;
@ -303,22 +303,22 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
trace_printk("ERROR!\n");
if (!disable_reader) {
if (consumer_fifo < 0)
if (consumer_fifo)
trace_printk("Running Consumer at SCHED_FIFO %s\n",
consumer_fifo == 1 ? "low" : "high");
else
trace_printk("Running Consumer at nice: %d\n",
consumer_nice);
else
trace_printk("Running Consumer at SCHED_FIFO %d\n",
consumer_fifo);
}
if (producer_fifo < 0)
if (producer_fifo)
trace_printk("Running Producer at SCHED_FIFO %s\n",
producer_fifo == 1 ? "low" : "high");
else
trace_printk("Running Producer at nice: %d\n",
producer_nice);
else
trace_printk("Running Producer at SCHED_FIFO %d\n",
producer_fifo);
/* Let the user know that the test is running at low priority */
if (producer_fifo < 0 && consumer_fifo < 0 &&
if (!producer_fifo && !consumer_fifo &&
producer_nice == MAX_NICE && consumer_nice == MAX_NICE)
trace_printk("WARNING!!! This test is running at lowest priority.\n");
@ -455,21 +455,19 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
* Run them as low-prio background tasks by default:
*/
if (!disable_reader) {
if (consumer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
.sched_priority = consumer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(consumer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
} else
if (consumer_fifo >= 2)
sched_set_fifo(consumer);
else if (consumer_fifo == 1)
sched_set_fifo_low(consumer);
else
set_user_nice(consumer, consumer_nice);
}
if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
.sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
} else
if (producer_fifo >= 2)
sched_set_fifo(producer);
else if (producer_fifo == 1)
sched_set_fifo_low(producer);
else
set_user_nice(producer, producer_nice);
return 0;