forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule
Make broader use of ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond() to check if a given rule contains an LSM conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no user-facing change. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
30031b0ec8
commit
592b24cbdc
|
@ -360,17 +360,10 @@ static bool ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
|
|||
static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *e;
|
||||
int i, result, needs_update;
|
||||
int result;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, e, &ima_policy_rules, list) {
|
||||
needs_update = 0;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
|
||||
if (entry->lsm[i].args_p) {
|
||||
needs_update = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!needs_update)
|
||||
if (!ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
result = ima_lsm_update_rule(entry);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user