forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
sched: rt-watchdog: fix .rlim_max = RLIM_INFINITY
Remove the curious logic to set it_sched_expires in the future. It useless because rt.timeout wouldn't be incremented anyway. Explicity check for RLIM_INFINITY as a test programm that had a 1s soft limit and a inf hard limit would SIGKILL at 1s. This is because RLIM_INFINITY+d-1 is d-2. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlsta <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> CC: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1020387f5f
commit
5a52dd5009
|
@ -1020,7 +1020,8 @@ static void check_thread_timers(struct task_struct *tsk,
|
|||
unsigned long hard = sig->rlim[RLIMIT_RTTIME].rlim_max;
|
||||
unsigned long *soft = &sig->rlim[RLIMIT_RTTIME].rlim_cur;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tsk->rt.timeout > DIV_ROUND_UP(hard, USEC_PER_SEC/HZ)) {
|
||||
if (hard != RLIM_INFINITY &&
|
||||
tsk->rt.timeout > DIV_ROUND_UP(hard, USEC_PER_SEC/HZ)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* At the hard limit, we just die.
|
||||
* No need to calculate anything else now.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1125,13 +1125,7 @@ static void watchdog(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
|
||||
p->rt.timeout++;
|
||||
next = DIV_ROUND_UP(min(soft, hard), USEC_PER_SEC/HZ);
|
||||
if (next > p->rt.timeout) {
|
||||
u64 next_time = p->se.sum_exec_runtime;
|
||||
|
||||
next_time += next * (NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ);
|
||||
if (p->it_sched_expires > next_time)
|
||||
p->it_sched_expires = next_time;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
if (p->rt.timeout > next)
|
||||
p->it_sched_expires = p->se.sum_exec_runtime;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user