forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
tools/memory-model: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from informal doc
smp_read_barrier_depends() has gone the way of mmiowb() and so many esoteric memory barriers before it. Drop the two mentions of this deceased barrier from the LKMM informal explanation document. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ce1b14e74
commit
628fd55671
|
@ -1122,12 +1122,10 @@ maintain at least the appearance of FIFO order.
|
|||
In practice, this difficulty is solved by inserting a special fence
|
||||
between P1's two loads when the kernel is compiled for the Alpha
|
||||
architecture. In fact, as of version 4.15, the kernel automatically
|
||||
adds this fence (called smp_read_barrier_depends() and defined as
|
||||
nothing at all on non-Alpha builds) after every READ_ONCE() and atomic
|
||||
load. The effect of the fence is to cause the CPU not to execute any
|
||||
po-later instructions until after the local cache has finished
|
||||
processing all the stores it has already received. Thus, if the code
|
||||
was changed to:
|
||||
adds this fence after every READ_ONCE() and atomic load on Alpha. The
|
||||
effect of the fence is to cause the CPU not to execute any po-later
|
||||
instructions until after the local cache has finished processing all
|
||||
the stores it has already received. Thus, if the code was changed to:
|
||||
|
||||
P1()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1146,14 +1144,14 @@ READ_ONCE() or another synchronization primitive rather than accessed
|
|||
directly.
|
||||
|
||||
The LKMM requires that smp_rmb(), acquire fences, and strong fences
|
||||
share this property with smp_read_barrier_depends(): They do not allow
|
||||
the CPU to execute any po-later instructions (or po-later loads in the
|
||||
case of smp_rmb()) until all outstanding stores have been processed by
|
||||
the local cache. In the case of a strong fence, the CPU first has to
|
||||
wait for all of its po-earlier stores to propagate to every other CPU
|
||||
in the system; then it has to wait for the local cache to process all
|
||||
the stores received as of that time -- not just the stores received
|
||||
when the strong fence began.
|
||||
share this property: They do not allow the CPU to execute any po-later
|
||||
instructions (or po-later loads in the case of smp_rmb()) until all
|
||||
outstanding stores have been processed by the local cache. In the
|
||||
case of a strong fence, the CPU first has to wait for all of its
|
||||
po-earlier stores to propagate to every other CPU in the system; then
|
||||
it has to wait for the local cache to process all the stores received
|
||||
as of that time -- not just the stores received when the strong fence
|
||||
began.
|
||||
|
||||
And of course, none of this matters for any architecture other than
|
||||
Alpha.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user