AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity

[PATCH] I2C: Coding style cleanups to via686a

Browse Source 
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 08:17, Greg KH wrote:
> [PATCH] I2C: Coding style cleanups to via686a
>
> The via686a hardware monitoring driver has infamous coding style at the
> moment. I'd like to clean up the mess before I start working on other
> changes to this driver. Is the following patch acceptable? No code
> change, only coding style (indentation, alignments, trailing white
> space, a few parentheses and a typo).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

Nice.

You missed some. This one is on top of your patch:

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Denis Vlasenko 2005-06-22 10:25:13 +03:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 200d481f28
commit 6328c0e163
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c
View File

@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
/*
via686a.c - Part of lm_sensors, Linux kernel modules
for hardware monitoring
for hardware monitoring
Copyright (c) 1998 - 2002 Frodo Looijaard <frodol@dds.nl>,
Kyösti Mälkki <kmalkki@cc.hut.fi>,
Kyösti Mälkki <kmalkki@cc.hut.fi>,
Mark Studebaker <mdsxyz123@yahoo.com>,
and Bob Dougherty <bobd@stanford.edu>
(Some conversion-factor data were contributed by Jonathan Teh Soon Yew
@ -171,18 +171,18 @@ static inline u8 FAN_TO_REG(long rpm, int div)
/******** TEMP CONVERSIONS (Bob Dougherty) *********/
/* linear fits from HWMon.cpp (Copyright 1998-2000 Jonathan Teh Soon Yew)
if(temp<169)
return double(temp)*0.427-32.08;
return double(temp)*0.427-32.08;
else if(temp>=169 && temp<=202)
return double(temp)*0.582-58.16;
return double(temp)*0.582-58.16;
else
return double(temp)*0.924-127.33;
return double(temp)*0.924-127.33;
A fifth-order polynomial fits the unofficial data (provided by Alex van
Kaam <darkside@chello.nl>) a bit better. It also give more reasonable
numbers on my machine (ie. they agree with what my BIOS tells me).
Here's the fifth-order fit to the 8-bit data:
temp = 1.625093e-10*val^5 - 1.001632e-07*val^4 + 2.457653e-05*val^3 -
2.967619e-03*val^2 + 2.175144e-01*val - 7.090067e+0.
2.967619e-03*val^2 + 2.175144e-01*val - 7.090067e+0.
(2000-10-25- RFD: thanks to Uwe Andersen <uandersen@mayah.com> for
finding my typos in this formula!)