forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
rcu/nocb: Reduce contention at no-CBs registry-time CB advancement
Currently, __call_rcu_nocb_wake() conditionally acquires the leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock, and only afterwards does rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() check to see if it is possible to advance callbacks without potentially needing to awaken the grace-period kthread. Given that the no-awaken check can be done locklessly, this commit reverses the order, so that rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() is invoked without holding the leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock and rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks the grace-period state before conditionally acquiring that lock, thus reducing the number of needless acquistions of the leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fcb09bddd
commit
6608c3a027
|
@ -1341,10 +1341,11 @@ static bool rcu_advance_cbs(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
|||
static void __maybe_unused rcu_advance_cbs_nowake(struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
|
||||
if (!rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)))
|
||||
if (!rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)) ||
|
||||
!raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rnp))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_advance_cbs(rnp, rdp));
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1668,10 +1668,8 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
|
|||
if (!rdp->nocb_cb_sleep &&
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
|
||||
// Already going full tilt, so don't try to rewake.
|
||||
} else if (rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
|
||||
raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rdp->mynode)) {
|
||||
} else if (rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
|
||||
rcu_advance_cbs_nowake(rdp->mynode, rdp);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rdp->mynode);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_FORCE,
|
||||
TPS("WakeOvfIsDeferred"));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user