forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
dlm: use wait_event_timeout
Use wait_event_timeout to avoid using a timer directly. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
05c32f47bf
commit
6d768177c2
|
@ -36,30 +36,23 @@
|
|||
* (LS_RECOVERY_STOP set due to failure of a node in ls_nodes). When another
|
||||
* function thinks it could have completed the waited-on task, they should wake
|
||||
* up ls_wait_general to get an immediate response rather than waiting for the
|
||||
* timer to detect the result. A timer wakes us up periodically while waiting
|
||||
* to see if we should abort due to a node failure. This should only be called
|
||||
* by the dlm_recoverd thread.
|
||||
* timeout. This uses a timeout so it can check periodically if the wait
|
||||
* should abort due to node failure (which doesn't cause a wake_up).
|
||||
* This should only be called by the dlm_recoverd thread.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static void dlm_wait_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dlm_ls *ls = (struct dlm_ls *) data;
|
||||
mod_timer(&ls->ls_timer, jiffies + (dlm_config.ci_recover_timer * HZ));
|
||||
wake_up(&ls->ls_wait_general);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int dlm_wait_function(struct dlm_ls *ls, int (*testfn) (struct dlm_ls *ls))
|
||||
{
|
||||
int error = 0;
|
||||
int rv;
|
||||
|
||||
init_timer(&ls->ls_timer);
|
||||
ls->ls_timer.function = dlm_wait_timer_fn;
|
||||
ls->ls_timer.data = (long) ls;
|
||||
ls->ls_timer.expires = jiffies + (dlm_config.ci_recover_timer * HZ);
|
||||
add_timer(&ls->ls_timer);
|
||||
|
||||
wait_event(ls->ls_wait_general, testfn(ls) || dlm_recovery_stopped(ls));
|
||||
del_timer_sync(&ls->ls_timer);
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
rv = wait_event_timeout(ls->ls_wait_general,
|
||||
testfn(ls) || dlm_recovery_stopped(ls),
|
||||
dlm_config.ci_recover_timer * HZ);
|
||||
if (rv)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (dlm_recovery_stopped(ls)) {
|
||||
log_debug(ls, "dlm_wait_function aborted");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user