From 703c88e035242202e3ab48fcbbbe0a7bc62fb7bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe David Borba Manana Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:54:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_add() if we failed to insert the orphan item, we would return without decrementing the orphan count that we just incremented before attempting the insertion, leaving the orphan inode count wrong. In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_del(), we were decrementing the inode orphan count if the bit BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED was set, which is logically wrong because it should be decremented if the bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM was set - after all we increment the count when we set the bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 57b27012d43a..939dd1ff34a7 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -2969,6 +2969,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode) if (insert >= 1) { ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode)); if (ret) { + atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes); if (reserve) { clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED, &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags); @@ -3018,14 +3019,16 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, release_rsv = 1; spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock); - if (trans && delete_item) - ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode)); - - if (release_rsv) { - btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode); + if (delete_item) { atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes); + if (trans) + ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, + btrfs_ino(inode)); } + if (release_rsv) + btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode); + return ret; }