forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
xfs: use ranged writeback and invalidation for direct IO
Now we are not doing silly things with dirtying buffers beyond EOF and using invalidation correctly, we can finally reduce the ranges of writeback and invalidation used by direct IO to match that of the IO being issued. Bring the writeback and invalidation ranges back to match the generic direct IO code - this will greatly reduce the perturbation of cached data when direct IO and buffered IO are mixed, but still provide the same buffered vs direct IO coherency behaviour we currently have. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
834ffca6f7
commit
7d4ea3ce63
|
@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ xfs_file_read_iter(
|
|||
if (inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
|
||||
ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(
|
||||
VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
|
||||
pos, -1);
|
||||
pos, pos + size - 1);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -303,7 +303,8 @@ xfs_file_read_iter(
|
|||
* happen on XFS. Warn if it does fail.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
|
||||
pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, -1);
|
||||
pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT,
|
||||
(pos + size - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -641,7 +642,7 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write(
|
|||
|
||||
if (mapping->nrpages) {
|
||||
ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
|
||||
pos, -1);
|
||||
pos, pos + count - 1);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -650,7 +651,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write(
|
|||
* happen on XFS. Warn if it does fail.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
|
||||
pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, -1);
|
||||
pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT,
|
||||
(pos + count - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user