forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ext4: replace opencoded i_writecount usage with inode_is_open_for_write()
There is a function which clearly conveys the objective of checking i_writecount. Additionally the usage in ext4_mb_initialize_context was wrong, since a node would have wrongfully been reported as writable if i_writecount had a negative value (MMAP_DENY_WRITE). Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
53cf978457
commit
82dd124c40
|
@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ void ext4_da_update_reserve_space(struct inode *inode,
|
|||
* inode's preallocations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((ei->i_reserved_data_blocks == 0) &&
|
||||
(atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 0))
|
||||
!inode_is_open_for_write(inode))
|
||||
ext4_discard_preallocations(inode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4176,9 +4176,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_group_or_file(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
|
|||
isize = (i_size_read(ac->ac_inode) + ac->ac_sb->s_blocksize - 1)
|
||||
>> bsbits;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((size == isize) &&
|
||||
!ext4_fs_is_busy(sbi) &&
|
||||
(atomic_read(&ac->ac_inode->i_writecount) == 0)) {
|
||||
if ((size == isize) && !ext4_fs_is_busy(sbi) &&
|
||||
!inode_is_open_for_write(ac->ac_inode)) {
|
||||
ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_NOPREALLOC;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -4258,7 +4257,7 @@ ext4_mb_initialize_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
|
|||
(unsigned) ar->goal, ac->ac_flags, ac->ac_2order,
|
||||
(unsigned) ar->lleft, (unsigned) ar->pleft,
|
||||
(unsigned) ar->lright, (unsigned) ar->pright,
|
||||
atomic_read(&ar->inode->i_writecount) ? "" : "non-");
|
||||
inode_is_open_for_write(ar->inode) ? "" : "non-");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user