forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_new_inode
It is redundant to call mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_new_inode() because all caller of nilfs_new_inode() will call mark_inode_dirty() after calling nilfs_new_inode() directly or indirectly in transaction. Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0234576d04
commit
9ca941d4b6
|
@ -323,7 +323,6 @@ struct inode *nilfs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, int mode)
|
|||
nilfs_init_acl(), proper cancellation of
|
||||
above jobs should be considered */
|
||||
|
||||
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
|
||||
return inode;
|
||||
|
||||
failed_acl:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int nilfs_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
|
|||
goto out_fail;
|
||||
|
||||
/* mark_inode_dirty(inode); */
|
||||
/* nilfs_new_inode() and page_symlink() do this */
|
||||
/* page_symlink() do this */
|
||||
|
||||
err = nilfs_add_nondir(dentry, inode);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user