forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
lockdep: fully reduce mark_lock_irq()
Now what its only two functions, they again look rather similar. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
42c50d544e
commit
9d3651a23d
|
@ -2061,13 +2061,13 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
|
|||
enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
|
||||
int new_bit)
|
||||
mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
|
||||
const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
|
||||
|
||||
int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
|
||||
int read = new_bit & 1;
|
||||
int dir = new_bit & 2;
|
||||
|
||||
check_usage_f usage = dir ?
|
||||
|
@ -2075,57 +2075,17 @@ mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
|
|||
|
||||
if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
|
||||
|
||||
if (!read && !valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
|
||||
* took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
#if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
|
||||
* took no hardirq-unsafe-read lock in the past:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
|
||||
return 2;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
|
||||
int new_bit)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
|
||||
const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
|
||||
|
||||
int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
|
||||
int dir = new_bit & 2;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
|
||||
if ((!read || (!dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS)) &&
|
||||
!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dir) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* just marked it hardirq-read-safe, check that this lock
|
||||
* took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
|
||||
if ((!read && STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
|
||||
!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* just marked it hardirq-read-unsafe, check that no
|
||||
* hardirq-safe lock in the system ever took it in the past:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
|
||||
return 2;
|
||||
|
@ -2133,36 +2093,6 @@ mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
|
|||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
|
||||
enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
switch(new_bit) {
|
||||
case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
|
||||
case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
|
||||
case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
|
||||
case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
|
||||
case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
|
||||
case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
|
||||
return mark_lock_irq_write(curr, this, new_bit);
|
||||
|
||||
case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
|
||||
case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
|
||||
case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
|
||||
case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ:
|
||||
case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ:
|
||||
case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
|
||||
return mark_lock_irq_read(curr, this, new_bit);
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
enum mark_type {
|
||||
#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) __STATE,
|
||||
#include "lockdep_states.h"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user