forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
lockdep: Support deadlock detection for recursive read locks in check_noncircular()
Currently, lockdep only has limit support for deadlock detection for recursive read locks. This patch support deadlock detection for recursive read locks. The basic idea is: We are about to add dependency B -> A in to the dependency graph, we use check_noncircular() to find whether we have a strong dependency path A -> .. -> B so that we have a strong dependency circle (a closed strong dependency path): A -> .. -> B -> A , which doesn't have two adjacent dependencies as -(*R)-> L -(S*)->. Since A -> .. -> B is already a strong dependency path, so if either B -> A is -(E*)-> or A -> .. -> B is -(*N)->, the circle A -> .. -> B -> A is strong, otherwise not. So we introduce a new match function hlock_conflict() to replace the class_equal() for the deadlock check in check_noncircular(). Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-10-boqun.feng@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
61775ed243
commit
9de0c9bbce
|
@ -1838,10 +1838,37 @@ static inline bool class_equal(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
|
|||
return entry->class == data;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are about to add B -> A into the dependency graph, and in __bfs() a
|
||||
* strong dependency path A -> .. -> B is found: hlock_class equals
|
||||
* entry->class.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We will have a deadlock case (conflict) if A -> .. -> B -> A is a strong
|
||||
* dependency cycle, that means:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Either
|
||||
*
|
||||
* a) B -> A is -(E*)->
|
||||
*
|
||||
* or
|
||||
*
|
||||
* b) A -> .. -> B is -(*N)-> (i.e. A -> .. -(*N)-> B)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* as then we don't have -(*R)-> -(S*)-> in the cycle.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool hlock_conflict(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct held_lock *hlock = (struct held_lock *)data;
|
||||
|
||||
return hlock_class(hlock) == entry->class && /* Found A -> .. -> B */
|
||||
(hlock->read == 0 || /* B -> A is -(E*)-> */
|
||||
!entry->only_xr); /* A -> .. -> B is -(*N)-> */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static noinline void print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this,
|
||||
struct lock_list *target,
|
||||
struct held_lock *check_src,
|
||||
struct held_lock *check_tgt)
|
||||
struct lock_list *target,
|
||||
struct held_lock *check_src,
|
||||
struct held_lock *check_tgt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *curr = current;
|
||||
struct lock_list *parent;
|
||||
|
@ -1950,13 +1977,13 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
|
|||
* <target> or not.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline enum bfs_result
|
||||
check_path(struct lock_class *target, struct lock_list *src_entry,
|
||||
check_path(struct held_lock *target, struct lock_list *src_entry,
|
||||
bool (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
|
||||
struct lock_list **target_entry)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum bfs_result ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __bfs_forwards(src_entry, (void *)target, class_equal,
|
||||
target_entry);
|
||||
ret = __bfs_forwards(src_entry, target, match, target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(bfs_error(ret)))
|
||||
print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
|
@ -1983,7 +2010,7 @@ check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
|
|||
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_cyclic_checks);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
|
||||
ret = check_path(target, &src_entry, hlock_conflict, &target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret == BFS_RMATCH)) {
|
||||
if (!*trace) {
|
||||
|
@ -2021,7 +2048,7 @@ check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target)
|
|||
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant_checks);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
|
||||
ret = check_path(target, &src_entry, class_equal, &target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret == BFS_RMATCH)
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user