forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
drm/nv50: delete ramfc object after disabling fifo, not before
ramfc is zero'ed upon destruction, so it's safer to do things in the right order. Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a51a3bf50d
commit
a87ff62a80
|
@ -317,17 +317,20 @@ void
|
|||
nv50_fifo_destroy_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev;
|
||||
struct nouveau_gpuobj_ref *ramfc = chan->ramfc;
|
||||
|
||||
NV_DEBUG(dev, "ch%d\n", chan->id);
|
||||
|
||||
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->ramfc);
|
||||
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->cache);
|
||||
|
||||
/* This will ensure the channel is seen as disabled. */
|
||||
chan->ramfc = NULL;
|
||||
nv50_fifo_channel_disable(dev, chan->id, false);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Dummy channel, also used on ch 127 */
|
||||
if (chan->id == 0)
|
||||
nv50_fifo_channel_disable(dev, 127, false);
|
||||
|
||||
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &ramfc);
|
||||
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->cache);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user