forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
socket, bpf: fix sk_filter use after free in sk_clone_lock
In sk_clone_lock(), we create a new socket and inherit most of the parent's members via sock_copy() which memcpy()'s various sections. Now, in case the parent socket had a BPF socket filter attached, then newsk->sk_filter points to the same instance as the original sk->sk_filter. sk_filter_charge() is then called on the newsk->sk_filter to take a reference and should that fail due to hitting max optmem, we bail out and release the newsk instance. The issue is that commit278571baca
("net: filter: simplify socket charging") wrongly combined the dismantle path with the failure path of xfrm_sk_clone_policy(). This means, even when charging failed, we call sk_free_unlock_clone() on the newsk, which then still points to the same sk_filter as the original sk. Thus, sk_free_unlock_clone() calls into __sk_destruct() eventually where it tests for present sk_filter and calls sk_filter_uncharge() on it, which potentially lets sk_omem_alloc wrap around and releases the eBPF prog and sk_filter structure from the (still intact) parent. Fix it by making sure that when sk_filter_charge() failed, we reset newsk->sk_filter back to NULL before passing to sk_free_unlock_clone(), so that we don't mess with the parents sk_filter. Only if xfrm_sk_clone_policy() fails, we did reach the point where either the parent's filter was NULL and as a result newsk's as well or where we previously had a successful sk_filter_charge(), thus for that case, we do need sk_filter_uncharge() to release the prior taken reference on sk_filter. Fixes:278571baca
("net: filter: simplify socket charging") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c64c0b3cac
commit
a97e50cc4c
|
@ -1544,6 +1544,12 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
|
|||
is_charged = sk_filter_charge(newsk, filter);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!is_charged || xfrm_sk_clone_policy(newsk, sk))) {
|
||||
/* We need to make sure that we don't uncharge the new
|
||||
* socket if we couldn't charge it in the first place
|
||||
* as otherwise we uncharge the parent's filter.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!is_charged)
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_filter, NULL);
|
||||
sk_free_unlock_clone(newsk);
|
||||
newsk = NULL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user