forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Revert "ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid doing too much for spurious notifies"
Commit2dc4128
(ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid doing too much for spurious notifies) changed the enable_slot() to check return value of pci_scan_slot() and if it is zero return early from the function. It means that there were no new devices in this particular slot. However, if a device appeared deeper in the hierarchy the code now ignores it causing things like Thunderbolt chaining fail to recognize new devices. The problem with Alex Williamson's machine was solved with commita47d8c8
(ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid parent bus rescans on spurious device checks) and hence we should be able to restore the original functionality that we always rescan on bus check notification. On a device check notification we still check what acpiphp_rescan_slot() returns and on zero bail out early. Fixes:2dc41281b1
(ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid doing too much for spurious notifies) Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
59612d1879
commit
ab1225901d
|
@ -552,9 +552,8 @@ static void __ref enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
|
|||
struct acpiphp_func *func;
|
||||
int max, pass;
|
||||
LIST_HEAD(add_list);
|
||||
int nr_found;
|
||||
|
||||
nr_found = acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
|
||||
acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
|
||||
max = acpiphp_max_busnr(bus);
|
||||
for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
|
||||
|
@ -574,9 +573,6 @@ static void __ref enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
__pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
|
||||
/* Nothing more to do here if there are no new devices on this bus. */
|
||||
if (!nr_found && (slot->flags & SLOT_ENABLED))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
|
||||
acpiphp_set_hpp_values(bus);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user