forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
x86/pci/xen: Disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking for XEN_HVM guests
commit 7e0815b3e09986d2fe651199363e135b9358132a upstream.
When a XEN_HVM guest uses the XEN PIRQ/Eventchannel mechanism, then
PCI/MSI[-X] masking is solely controlled by the hypervisor, but contrary to
XEN_PV guests this does not disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking in the PCI/MSI
layer.
This can lead to a situation where the PCI/MSI layer masks an MSI[-X]
interrupt and the hypervisor grants the write despite the fact that it
already requested the interrupt. As a consequence interrupt delivery on the
affected device is not happening ever.
Set pci_msi_ignore_mask to prevent that like it's done for XEN_PV guests
already.
Fixes: 809f9267bb
("xen: map MSIs into pirqs")
Reported-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>
Reported-by: Dusty Mabe <dustymabe@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tuaduxj5.ffs@tglx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8fcce58c59
commit
ad604cbd1d
|
@ -476,7 +476,6 @@ static __init void xen_setup_pci_msi(void)
|
|||
xen_msi_ops.setup_msi_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
xen_msi_ops.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_pv_teardown_msi_irqs;
|
||||
pci_msi_ignore_mask = 1;
|
||||
} else if (xen_hvm_domain()) {
|
||||
xen_msi_ops.setup_msi_irqs = xen_hvm_setup_msi_irqs;
|
||||
xen_msi_ops.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs;
|
||||
|
@ -490,6 +489,11 @@ static __init void xen_setup_pci_msi(void)
|
|||
* in allocating the native domain and never use it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
x86_init.irqs.create_pci_msi_domain = xen_create_pci_msi_domain;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* With XEN PIRQ/Eventchannels in use PCI/MSI[-X] masking is solely
|
||||
* controlled by the hypervisor.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pci_msi_ignore_mask = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user