forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
locking/rtmutex: Optimize setting task running after being blocked
We explicitly mark the task running after returning from a __rt_mutex_slowlock() call, which does the actual sleeping via wait-wake-trylocking. As such, this patch does two things: (1) refactors the code so that setting current to TASK_RUNNING is done by __rt_mutex_slowlock(), and not by the callers. The downside to this is that it becomes a bit unclear when at what point we block. As such I've added a comment that the task blocks when calling __rt_mutex_slowlock() so readers can figure out when it is running again. (2) relaxes setting current's state through __set_current_state(), instead of it's more expensive barrier alternative. There was no need for the implied barrier as we're obviously not planning on blocking. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422857784.18096.1.camel@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
73105994c5
commit
afffc6c180
|
@ -1130,6 +1130,7 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
|||
set_current_state(state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1188,10 +1189,9 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
|||
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(!ret))
|
||||
/* sleep on the mutex */
|
||||
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
||||
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
|
||||
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
|
||||
|
@ -1626,10 +1626,9 @@ int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
|
||||
/* sleep on the mutex */
|
||||
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret))
|
||||
remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user