AcoSail/kernel_optimize_test
8
0
Fork 0
forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
Code Pull Requests Activity

Btrfs: fix confusing edquot happening case

Browse Source 
Step to reproduce:
	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/<mnt>/data bs=1M count=10
	sync
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup create 0/5 <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup limit 5M 0/5 <mnt>
	rm -f /<mnt>/data
	sync
	btrfs qgroup show <mnt>
	dd if=/dev/zero of=data bs=1M count=1

>From the perspective of users, qgroup's referenced or exclusive
is negative,but user can not continue to write data! a workaround
way is to cast u64 to s64 when doing qgroup reservation.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
Wang Shilong 2013-04-15 12:56:49 +00:00 committed by Josef Bacik
parent e36902d4cc
commit b4fcd6be6b
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
View File

@ -1616,14 +1616,14 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_reserve(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 num_bytes)
qg = (struct btrfs_qgroup *)(uintptr_t)unode->aux;
if ((qg->lim_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_RFER) &&
qg->reserved + qg->rfer + num_bytes >
qg->reserved + (s64)qg->rfer + num_bytes >
qg->max_rfer) {
ret = -EDQUOT;
goto out;
}
if ((qg->lim_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_EXCL) &&
qg->reserved + qg->excl + num_bytes >
qg->reserved + (s64)qg->excl + num_bytes >
qg->max_excl) {
ret = -EDQUOT;
goto out;