forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
selinux_setprocattr() does ptrace_parent(p) under task_lock(p), but task_struct->alloc_lock doesn't pin ->parent or ->ptrace, this looks confusing and triggers the "suspicious RCU usage" warning because ptrace_parent() does rcu_dereference_check(). And in theory this is wrong, spin_lock()->preempt_disable() doesn't necessarily imply rcu_read_lock() we need to access the ->parent. Reported-by: Evan McNabb <emcnabb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
46d01d6322
commit
c0c1439541
|
@ -5588,11 +5588,11 @@ static int selinux_setprocattr(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
/* Check for ptracing, and update the task SID if ok.
|
||||
Otherwise, leave SID unchanged and fail. */
|
||||
ptsid = 0;
|
||||
task_lock(p);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
tracer = ptrace_parent(p);
|
||||
if (tracer)
|
||||
ptsid = task_sid(tracer);
|
||||
task_unlock(p);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (tracer) {
|
||||
error = avc_has_perm(ptsid, sid, SECCLASS_PROCESS,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user