forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
libata: remove irq_on from ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset()
It seems irq_on() in ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset() are leftover of the EDD reset. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e04b3b9d03
commit
c6e54a5781
@ -3164,9 +3164,6 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
|
||||
if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81))
|
||||
ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
|
||||
|
||||
/* re-enable interrupts */
|
||||
ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
|
||||
|
||||
/* is double-select really necessary? */
|
||||
if (ap->device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE)
|
||||
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
|
||||
@ -3551,10 +3548,6 @@ void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
|
||||
if (sata_scr_read(ap, SCR_ERROR, &serror) == 0)
|
||||
sata_scr_write(ap, SCR_ERROR, serror);
|
||||
|
||||
/* re-enable interrupts */
|
||||
if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
|
||||
ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
|
||||
|
||||
/* is double-select really necessary? */
|
||||
if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE)
|
||||
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
|
||||
|
@ -912,10 +912,6 @@ static void scc_std_postreset (struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/* re-enable interrupts */
|
||||
if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
|
||||
ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
|
||||
|
||||
/* is double-select really necessary? */
|
||||
if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE)
|
||||
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user