forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
mm: memcontrol: bring back the VM_BUG_ON() in mem_cgroup_swapout()
Clark stumbled over a VM_BUG_ON() in -RT which was then was removed by
Johannes in commit f371763a79
("mm: memcontrol: fix false-positive
VM_BUG_ON() on -rt"). The comment before that patch was a tiny bit better
than it is now. While the patch claimed to fix a false-postive on -RT
this was not the case. None of the -RT folks ACKed it and it was not a
false positive report. That was a *real* problem.
This patch updates the comment that is improper because it refers to
"disabled preemption" as a consequence of that lock being taken. A
spin_lock() disables preemption, true, but in this case the code relies on
the fact that the lock _also_ disables interrupts once it is acquired.
And this is the important detail (which was checked the VM_BUG_ON()) which
needs to be pointed out. This is the hint one needs while looking at the
code. It was explained by Johannes on the list that the per-CPU variables
are protected by local_irq_save(). The BUG_ON() was helpful. This code
has been workarounded in -RT in the meantime. I wouldn't mind running
into more of those if the code in question uses *special* kind of locking
since now there is no verification (in terms of lockdep or BUG_ON()) and
therefore I bring the VM_BUG_ON() check back in.
The two functions after the comment could also have a "local_irq_save()"
dance around them in order to serialize access to the per-CPU variables.
This has been avoided because the interrupts should be off.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c98c36355d
commit
ce9ce6659a
|
@ -5965,7 +5965,13 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
|
|||
if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
|
||||
page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Caller disabled preemption with mapping->tree_lock */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Interrupts should be disabled here because the caller holds the
|
||||
* mapping->tree_lock lock which is taken with interrupts-off. It is
|
||||
* important here to have the interrupts disabled because it is the
|
||||
* only synchronisation we have for udpating the per-CPU variables.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
VM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
|
||||
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(memcg, page, -1);
|
||||
memcg_check_events(memcg, page);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user