forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[ARM] 4002/1: S3C24XX: leave parent IRQs unmasked
Do not bother masking/unmasking the parent IRQ for the mulitplexed EINT irqs, as masking the leaf seems to be fine. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
32d2deeab9
commit
d4f3e084ad
@ -206,18 +206,6 @@ s3c_irqext_mask(unsigned int irqno)
|
||||
mask = __raw_readl(S3C24XX_EINTMASK);
|
||||
mask |= ( 1UL << irqno);
|
||||
__raw_writel(mask, S3C24XX_EINTMASK);
|
||||
|
||||
if (irqno <= (IRQ_EINT7 - EXTINT_OFF)) {
|
||||
/* check to see if all need masking */
|
||||
|
||||
if ((mask & (0xf << 4)) == (0xf << 4)) {
|
||||
/* all masked, mask the parent */
|
||||
s3c_irq_mask(IRQ_EINT4t7);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* todo: the same check as above for the rest of the irq regs...*/
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
@ -229,7 +217,6 @@ s3c_irqext_ack(unsigned int irqno)
|
||||
|
||||
bit = 1UL << (irqno - EXTINT_OFF);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
mask = __raw_readl(S3C24XX_EINTMASK);
|
||||
|
||||
__raw_writel(bit, S3C24XX_EINTPEND);
|
||||
@ -258,8 +245,6 @@ s3c_irqext_unmask(unsigned int irqno)
|
||||
mask = __raw_readl(S3C24XX_EINTMASK);
|
||||
mask &= ~( 1UL << irqno);
|
||||
__raw_writel(mask, S3C24XX_EINTMASK);
|
||||
|
||||
s3c_irq_unmask((irqno <= (IRQ_EINT7 - EXTINT_OFF)) ? IRQ_EINT4t7 : IRQ_EINT8t23);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user