forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
drm: edid revision 0 is valid
edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed. We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so it can't ever be less than 0. Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because of it. Reported-by: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b3f5e7329d
commit
d61e7380b4
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n", edid->version);
|
||||
goto bad;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (edid->revision <= 0 || edid->revision > 3) {
|
||||
if (edid->revision > 3) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("EDID has minor version %d, which is not between 0-3\n", edid->revision);
|
||||
goto bad;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user