forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[PATCH] RTC class: error checks
The rtc_is_valid_tm() routine needs to treat some of the fields it checks as unsigned, to prevent wrongly accepting invalid rtc_time structs; this is the same approach used elsewhere in the RTC code for such tests. Conversely, rtc_proc_show() is missing one invalid-day-of-month test that rtc_is_valid_tm() makes: there is no day zero. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
818a8674b0
commit
db621f174d
|
@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtc_time_to_tm);
|
|||
int rtc_valid_tm(struct rtc_time *tm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (tm->tm_year < 70
|
||||
|| tm->tm_mon >= 12
|
||||
|| ((unsigned)tm->tm_mon) >= 12
|
||||
|| tm->tm_mday < 1
|
||||
|| tm->tm_mday > rtc_month_days(tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_year + 1900)
|
||||
|| tm->tm_hour >= 24
|
||||
|| tm->tm_min >= 60
|
||||
|| tm->tm_sec >= 60)
|
||||
|| ((unsigned)tm->tm_hour) >= 24
|
||||
|| ((unsigned)tm->tm_min) >= 60
|
||||
|| ((unsigned)tm->tm_sec) >= 60)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
|
|||
seq_printf(seq, "%02d-", alrm.time.tm_mon + 1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
seq_printf(seq, "**-");
|
||||
if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_mday <= 31)
|
||||
if (alrm.time.tm_mday && (unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_mday <= 31)
|
||||
seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday);
|
||||
else
|
||||
seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user