From def5b5b26e6d97820465fadcb7d1cb73cc4daf33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:38:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] kcopyd use mutex instead of semaphore Kcopyd uses a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore, Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Neil Brown Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- drivers/md/kcopyd.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/kcopyd.c b/drivers/md/kcopyd.c index 7e052378c47e..f3831f31223e 100644 --- a/drivers/md/kcopyd.c +++ b/drivers/md/kcopyd.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ struct kcopyd_job { * These fields are only used if the job has been split * into more manageable parts. */ - struct semaphore lock; + struct mutex lock; atomic_t sub_jobs; sector_t progress; }; @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ static void segment_complete(int read_err, sector_t count = 0; struct kcopyd_job *job = (struct kcopyd_job *) context; - down(&job->lock); + mutex_lock(&job->lock); /* update the error */ if (read_err) @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static void segment_complete(int read_err, job->progress += count; } } - up(&job->lock); + mutex_unlock(&job->lock); if (count) { int i; @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ int kcopyd_copy(struct kcopyd_client *kc, struct io_region *from, dispatch_job(job); else { - init_MUTEX(&job->lock); + mutex_init(&job->lock); job->progress = 0; split_job(job); }