forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE
It is theoretically possible for the ACPI EC GPE to be set after the
s2idle_ops->wake() called from s2idle_loop() has returned and before
the subsequent pm_wakeup_pending() check is carried out. If that
happens, the resulting wakeup event will cause the system to resume
even though it may be a spurious one.
To avoid that race, first make the ->wake() callback in struct
platform_s2idle_ops return a bool value indicating whether or not
to let the system resume and rearrange s2idle_loop() to use that
value instad of the direct pm_wakeup_pending() call if ->wake() is
present.
Next, rework acpi_s2idle_wake() to process EC events and check
pm_wakeup_pending() before re-arming the SCI for system wakeup
to prevent it from triggering prematurely and add comments to
that function to explain the rationale for the new code flow.
Fixes: 56b9918490
("PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow")
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0ac20c3f6
commit
e3728b50cd
|
@ -990,21 +990,28 @@ static void acpi_s2idle_sync(void)
|
|||
acpi_os_wait_events_complete(); /* synchronize Notify handling */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void acpi_s2idle_wake(void)
|
||||
static bool acpi_s2idle_wake(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED is set for the SCI at this point, the SCI has
|
||||
* not triggered while suspended, so bail out.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!acpi_sci_irq_valid() ||
|
||||
irqd_is_wakeup_armed(irq_get_irq_data(acpi_sci_irq)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (!acpi_sci_irq_valid())
|
||||
return pm_wakeup_pending();
|
||||
|
||||
while (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED is set for the SCI at this point, the
|
||||
* SCI has not triggered while suspended, so bail out (the
|
||||
* wakeup is pending anyway and the SCI is not the source of
|
||||
* it).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (irqd_is_wakeup_armed(irq_get_irq_data(acpi_sci_irq)))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If there are no EC events to process, the wakeup is regarded
|
||||
* as a genuine one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If there are EC events to process, the wakeup may be a spurious one
|
||||
* coming from the EC.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe()) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Cancel the wakeup and process all pending events in case
|
||||
* there are any wakeup ones in there.
|
||||
|
@ -1017,8 +1024,19 @@ static void acpi_s2idle_wake(void)
|
|||
|
||||
acpi_s2idle_sync();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The SCI is in the "suspended" state now and it cannot produce
|
||||
* new wakeup events till the rearming below, so if any of them
|
||||
* are pending here, they must be resulting from the processing
|
||||
* of EC events above or coming from somewhere else.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pm_wakeup_pending())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
rearm_wake_irq(acpi_sci_irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void acpi_s2idle_restore_early(void)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ struct platform_s2idle_ops {
|
|||
int (*begin)(void);
|
||||
int (*prepare)(void);
|
||||
int (*prepare_late)(void);
|
||||
void (*wake)(void);
|
||||
bool (*wake)(void);
|
||||
void (*restore_early)(void);
|
||||
void (*restore)(void);
|
||||
void (*end)(void);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ static void s2idle_loop(void)
|
|||
* to avoid them upfront.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
if (s2idle_ops && s2idle_ops->wake)
|
||||
s2idle_ops->wake();
|
||||
|
||||
if (pm_wakeup_pending())
|
||||
if (s2idle_ops && s2idle_ops->wake) {
|
||||
if (s2idle_ops->wake())
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pm_wakeup_clear(false);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user