diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 172e12df9eaa..d1c009e8c57f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4268,6 +4268,11 @@ static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) return false; } +static bool allow_tail_call_in_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + return env->prog->jit_requested && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64); +} + static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) { @@ -4383,8 +4388,8 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, case BPF_FUNC_tail_call: if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY) goto error; - if (env->subprog_cnt > 1) { - verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n"); + if (env->subprog_cnt > 1 && !allow_tail_call_in_subprogs(env)) { + verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in non-JITed programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n"); return -EINVAL; } break; @@ -10469,6 +10474,13 @@ static int fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return err; } #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON + if (env->subprog_cnt > 1 && env->prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) { + /* When JIT fails the progs with bpf2bpf calls and tail_calls + * have to be rejected, since interpreter doesn't support them yet. + */ + verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in non-JITed programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) { if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) || insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) @@ -10632,8 +10644,9 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * the program array. */ prog->cb_access = 1; - env->prog->aux->stack_depth = MAX_BPF_STACK; - env->prog->aux->max_pkt_offset = MAX_PACKET_OFF; + if (!allow_tail_call_in_subprogs(env)) + prog->aux->stack_depth = MAX_BPF_STACK; + prog->aux->max_pkt_offset = MAX_PACKET_OFF; /* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode to avoid * conditional branch in the interpeter for every normal