forked from luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
[PATCH] uml: SIGWINCH handling cleanup
Code cleanup - unregister_winch and winch_cleanup had some duplicate code. This is now abstracted out into free_winch. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7eebe8a9c5
commit
e464bf2bed
@ -774,55 +774,49 @@ void register_winch_irq(int fd, int tty_fd, int pid, struct tty_struct *tty)
|
||||
printk("register_winch_irq - failed to register IRQ\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
|
||||
static void free_winch(struct winch *winch)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *ele;
|
||||
struct winch *winch, *found = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
|
||||
winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
|
||||
if(winch->tty == tty){
|
||||
found = winch;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(found == NULL)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
|
||||
list_del(&winch->list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if(winch->pid != -1)
|
||||
os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
|
||||
if(winch->pid != -1)
|
||||
os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
|
||||
if(winch->fd != -1)
|
||||
os_close_file(winch->fd);
|
||||
|
||||
free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
|
||||
kfree(winch);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
err:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
|
||||
kfree(winch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX: No lock as it's an exitcall... is this valid? Depending on cleanup
|
||||
* order... are we sure that nothing else is done on the list? */
|
||||
static void winch_cleanup(void)
|
||||
static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *ele;
|
||||
struct winch *winch;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
|
||||
winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
|
||||
if(winch->fd != -1){
|
||||
/* Why is this different from the above free_irq(),
|
||||
* which deactivates SIGIO? This searches the FD
|
||||
* somewhere else and removes it from the list... */
|
||||
deactivate_fd(winch->fd, WINCH_IRQ);
|
||||
os_close_file(winch->fd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(winch->pid != -1)
|
||||
os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
|
||||
if(winch->tty == tty){
|
||||
free_winch(winch);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void winch_cleanup(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *ele, *next;
|
||||
struct winch *winch;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_safe(ele, next, &winch_handlers){
|
||||
winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
|
||||
free_winch(winch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
__uml_exitcall(winch_cleanup);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user